Skip to main content

Perspective Framing

Beloved does some interesting things with the perspective and framing of events depending on which character is experiencing/experienced them. Sethe's rememory is probably one of the most interesting narrative choices in this novel, very reminiscent of Kurt Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse Five's Tralfamadorian time travel. This kind of framing for narratives can make some stories very confusing, but in Beloved it helps to feed us information.

The constant jumping around focuses the story not on advancing a plot, but building the characters and the setting they inhabit. This is a good tactic for building characters, as the narrative jumps around to each person's perspective in turn. Certain events are played on repeat but from different angles. I would be interested to see how this would work in a film adaptation. Would the directors use camera angles? Would there have to be separate arcs for each character? I've seen this done in a few other works where the narrative focuses on building the world from multiple different views, but Beloved is nice and concise as a single story. Does anyone know of more works that also follow this whole world building format (Asking for a friend), and how do you feel about the constant perspective shifts and how this helps establish the world. Also, do you feel the need for Beloved to have a more forward plot, or do you think the constant rememory is better?

Comments

  1. SarahNovember 17, 2018 at 8:41 PM

    I remember Mr. Mitchell asking us in class who we believed to be the main character, and several people said Sethe. However, we never reached a true agreement, and personally I don't believe there is one "absolute" main character. Morrison uses an amazing technique of slowly circling around the main plot line and pivotal moment in the novel. Although this method is a bit disorientating, it is extremely effective and also allows the reader to see Sethe in a different light then they might have originally.

    ReplyDelete
  2. UnknownNovember 20, 2018 at 9:41 AM

    I agree that the rememory is a great way to develop the characters in the novel. In fact, I feel like Morrison is effective in doing so. I don't think that the novel should have a more forward plot because the plot is there, but it is based more off the past. Using rememory to gather information is a great way lengthen what would probably be a short plot and to fully develop the characters, which is something that I appreciate most.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Their Eyes Were Watching 19th Century Novel

I've said it once and I'll say it again. Their Eyes Were Watching God  seems to me like an archetypal 19th Century British novel. Something about how the prose is structured and the events played out seemed exactly like the events we would read about in 19th Century. There are multiple suitors and each one the main character sees something in them but then they end up not liking a few of them until they meet the one they decide is right for them. Then they get into some trouble with this "perfect" suitor and this problem carries the rest of the plot. The arranged marriage also is very reminiscent of the stifling atmosphere of 19th century novels. Towards the end of the book it becomes a more modern piece (because it starts with a marriage and ends with no partner as opposed to the reverse in 19th century novels), as well as having a more progressive feminist message. Still, some deep dark part of me has a traumatic fit whenever I think of Pride and Prejudice .
3 comments
Read more

Invisible Horseman Shuffle

Sorry To Bother You  is... a movie. Ending aside, the movie gave me very distinct vibes to two different books we read this semester. The more obvious one was the one Mr. Mitchell alluded to, White Boy Shuffle , which was the same kind of dreamlike experience. Both the works have the comedy elements interspersed with the grim and bleak aspects. However, the book Sorry To Bother You  most reminded me of was Invisible Man , mostly because Cassius Green is basically trying to find his place in things by finding work and looking for success by trying to assimilate himself into white society and "undermine them with yeses". Unfortunately because of the plot, yeses aren't enough to stop the inhuman experiments being preformed on people. Therefore Cassius switches from a meek individual who goes along with what his corporate says to a more violent outlook against WorryFree. The corporate guy (I forgot his name since names in this movie are kinda all over the place) said Cassius ...
4 comments
Read more

Speeches

In Invisible Man , the narrator seems to have a natural talent for public speaking. He begins speaking during his school years before the Battle Royale and has had a speech during the home eviction. He has also been drafted into the "Brotherhood" to do more public speaking. He seems to have a talent for rousing crowds, even if that was not shown in his Battle Royale speech. After the home eviction speech, he thinks of himself as a famous speaker akin to Booker T. Washington and takes pride in that. Now to the main point. Is the author fond of speeches because it makes him more individual? During his speeches he is separate from the crowd, able to show his views on matters and not be just a cog in a machine (as Norton calls it). Even if he may not be truly visible, his unique existence cannot be fully denied. Is not being able to make speeches why he has retreated within his "hole" during the prologue? Is writing this book and sharing his views and experiences how ...
4 comments
Read more