Skip to main content

Perspective Framing

Beloved does some interesting things with the perspective and framing of events depending on which character is experiencing/experienced them. Sethe's rememory is probably one of the most interesting narrative choices in this novel, very reminiscent of Kurt Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse Five's Tralfamadorian time travel. This kind of framing for narratives can make some stories very confusing, but in Beloved it helps to feed us information.

The constant jumping around focuses the story not on advancing a plot, but building the characters and the setting they inhabit. This is a good tactic for building characters, as the narrative jumps around to each person's perspective in turn. Certain events are played on repeat but from different angles. I would be interested to see how this would work in a film adaptation. Would the directors use camera angles? Would there have to be separate arcs for each character? I've seen this done in a few other works where the narrative focuses on building the world from multiple different views, but Beloved is nice and concise as a single story. Does anyone know of more works that also follow this whole world building format (Asking for a friend), and how do you feel about the constant perspective shifts and how this helps establish the world. Also, do you feel the need for Beloved to have a more forward plot, or do you think the constant rememory is better?

Comments

  1. I remember Mr. Mitchell asking us in class who we believed to be the main character, and several people said Sethe. However, we never reached a true agreement, and personally I don't believe there is one "absolute" main character. Morrison uses an amazing technique of slowly circling around the main plot line and pivotal moment in the novel. Although this method is a bit disorientating, it is extremely effective and also allows the reader to see Sethe in a different light then they might have originally.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree that the rememory is a great way to develop the characters in the novel. In fact, I feel like Morrison is effective in doing so. I don't think that the novel should have a more forward plot because the plot is there, but it is based more off the past. Using rememory to gather information is a great way lengthen what would probably be a short plot and to fully develop the characters, which is something that I appreciate most.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Educational Naturalism

Throughout Native Son, Bigger makes choices. Many of these choices cause him to tumble down a continuous spiral to his eventual trial and execution for the murder and supposed rape of Mary Dalton. While reading this book, I thought at many times to try to call out to Bigger, and give him a bit of guidance because I could see where some of his actions were leading. I realized that I was using education that I had received in my schooling years that Bigger was not fortunate enough to have, and that Bigger's environment hadn't prepared his foresight enough to prevent him from making several fatal mistakes in a row. So is the true culprit Naturalism? I believe that Wright was trying to achieve the same response I gave to seeing Bigger make those mistakes. I believe that his Naturalist "lab" (for lack of a better term) was designed to show how much education can play into the choices we make. And I do not mean only the education you receive in schools. If Bigger had seen...

Their Eyes Were Watching 19th Century Novel

I've said it once and I'll say it again. Their Eyes Were Watching God  seems to me like an archetypal 19th Century British novel. Something about how the prose is structured and the events played out seemed exactly like the events we would read about in 19th Century. There are multiple suitors and each one the main character sees something in them but then they end up not liking a few of them until they meet the one they decide is right for them. Then they get into some trouble with this "perfect" suitor and this problem carries the rest of the plot. The arranged marriage also is very reminiscent of the stifling atmosphere of 19th century novels. Towards the end of the book it becomes a more modern piece (because it starts with a marriage and ends with no partner as opposed to the reverse in 19th century novels), as well as having a more progressive feminist message. Still, some deep dark part of me has a traumatic fit whenever I think of Pride and Prejudice .

Invisible Horseman Shuffle

Sorry To Bother You  is... a movie. Ending aside, the movie gave me very distinct vibes to two different books we read this semester. The more obvious one was the one Mr. Mitchell alluded to, White Boy Shuffle , which was the same kind of dreamlike experience. Both the works have the comedy elements interspersed with the grim and bleak aspects. However, the book Sorry To Bother You  most reminded me of was Invisible Man , mostly because Cassius Green is basically trying to find his place in things by finding work and looking for success by trying to assimilate himself into white society and "undermine them with yeses". Unfortunately because of the plot, yeses aren't enough to stop the inhuman experiments being preformed on people. Therefore Cassius switches from a meek individual who goes along with what his corporate says to a more violent outlook against WorryFree. The corporate guy (I forgot his name since names in this movie are kinda all over the place) said Cassius ...