Skip to main content

Their Eyes Were Watching 19th Century Novel

I've said it once and I'll say it again.

Their Eyes Were Watching God seems to me like an archetypal 19th Century British novel. Something about how the prose is structured and the events played out seemed exactly like the events we would read about in 19th Century. There are multiple suitors and each one the main character sees something in them but then they end up not liking a few of them until they meet the one they decide is right for them. Then they get into some trouble with this "perfect" suitor and this problem carries the rest of the plot. The arranged marriage also is very reminiscent of the stifling atmosphere of 19th century novels. Towards the end of the book it becomes a more modern piece (because it starts with a marriage and ends with no partner as opposed to the reverse in 19th century novels), as well as having a more progressive feminist message. Still, some deep dark part of me has a traumatic fit whenever I think of Pride and Prejudice.

Comments

  1. Ethan AshbrookNovember 4, 2018 at 9:35 AM

    This is speaking from a person who didn't take 19th Century Novels, but I can definitely see where you're coming from. If you take a more societal perspective of Janie's life, what she is expected to do feels very constricted. And most of what she does end up doing is partly because her husband(s) allowed her to do it. Like with Jodie, she's just expected to sit in the store, look pretty, and do nothing else, which feels very Victorian and 19th-century-England. You can definitely draw some connections between the two, which is weird, but also pretty cool.

    ReplyDelete
  2. SamirNovember 11, 2018 at 10:24 PM

    I did not take 19th Century Novels, but this is a cool post! The dynamics you are pointing out between the male and female characters, and the way that the plot develops seem reminiscent of what was expected of women at the time. Janie is expected to be the quiet and submissive housewife, who lives to please her husband. She also ends up in an arranged marriage right at the beginning of the book. I can definitely see how it would fit into a 19th century novel, cool post!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Aidan GarrettNovember 16, 2018 at 11:18 AM

    Great post! Even though I wasn't in 19th Century Novels the way you explain this makes sense. And I think it is similar to what we were talking about in class in regards to Wright's criticism of the novel. She wasn't trying to write a protest novel but a love story with African-American characters.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Educational Naturalism

Throughout Native Son, Bigger makes choices. Many of these choices cause him to tumble down a continuous spiral to his eventual trial and execution for the murder and supposed rape of Mary Dalton. While reading this book, I thought at many times to try to call out to Bigger, and give him a bit of guidance because I could see where some of his actions were leading. I realized that I was using education that I had received in my schooling years that Bigger was not fortunate enough to have, and that Bigger's environment hadn't prepared his foresight enough to prevent him from making several fatal mistakes in a row. So is the true culprit Naturalism? I believe that Wright was trying to achieve the same response I gave to seeing Bigger make those mistakes. I believe that his Naturalist "lab" (for lack of a better term) was designed to show how much education can play into the choices we make. And I do not mean only the education you receive in schools. If Bigger had seen
7 comments
Read more

Speeches

In Invisible Man , the narrator seems to have a natural talent for public speaking. He begins speaking during his school years before the Battle Royale and has had a speech during the home eviction. He has also been drafted into the "Brotherhood" to do more public speaking. He seems to have a talent for rousing crowds, even if that was not shown in his Battle Royale speech. After the home eviction speech, he thinks of himself as a famous speaker akin to Booker T. Washington and takes pride in that. Now to the main point. Is the author fond of speeches because it makes him more individual? During his speeches he is separate from the crowd, able to show his views on matters and not be just a cog in a machine (as Norton calls it). Even if he may not be truly visible, his unique existence cannot be fully denied. Is not being able to make speeches why he has retreated within his "hole" during the prologue? Is writing this book and sharing his views and experiences how
4 comments
Read more

Dialects in Literature

In the most recent novel we are reading in class, Their Eyes Were Watching God , the characters all speak in a distinct dialect of English that is non-standard. "I" is changed to "Ah", verbs are shortened, there are double negatives, and so on. Though for some this may be hard to read and understand, especially in a book where most of the story is delivered through dialogue, but I feel that these kinds of literary quirks can really differentiate a story. Not just in a narrative about African Americans, but in other literature with other English dialects. People can usually tell the difference between British English and American Standard English when spoken, but when written as dialogue they very rarely show any of the differences in the dialects. Given, those two are very similar but the same kind of logic can be applied to other dialects of English. Authors usually wrote their dialogue in standard, and they would use a different dialect if the character was "
3 comments
Read more