Skip to main content

A Thousand Faces

Towards the end of Invisible Man the narrator adopts the persona of Rinehart, and several people mistake him as such. Also around the same time he has an affair with a Brotherhood member named Sybil. In both of those instances, the narrator uses the fact that he has a fake identity to get away with what he is doing. In these cases, does the narrator's invisibility act as a tool that the narrator uses to have his way? Along the same lines, does the narrator even know his invisibility is being used this way. By this point in the book the narrator does sort of know he is "invisible", but hasn't said much about it and hasn't given it a proper name. This use of his "thousand faces" could help him "agree them[whites] to death", but the narrator seems to only use it to survive and not get caught by certain people. What are your opinions on the "thousand faces" interpretation, and are there any other clear examples of other times he's explicitly used his invisibility for gain?

Comments

  1. isabella solisOctober 8, 2018 at 1:40 PM

    I mentioned this on someone else's post, but I interpreted the narrator's time as Rinehart as like his pupal stage, a place to reform himself and come out changed. Going along with the insect metaphor, he makes his own new confusing markings to ward off predators. I think that's basically what the thousand faces mean, it's like he's creating this new way of being to confuse other people. With that, him going underground to completely emerge as his own person would suggest that he'll end up with his own "markings," independent of what others would expect from him.

    ReplyDelete
  2. SarahOctober 10, 2018 at 8:29 PM

    I think that at this point the Narrator isn't fully aware of his invisibility and while he may be trying to harness this "power" for his own good, other people are using him in the same way. For example, his affair with Sybil had the purpose, at least in his mind, of gathering information that would help him to attack the brotherhood. At the same time, Sybil was using him for her own purposes.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Tue DoOctober 11, 2018 at 6:56 PM

    The narrator never is able to fully take advantage of anyone in the book. I don't think it's because he doesn't want to, but because he's unable to. For example, Sybil just wants him in her rape fantasy. I think it's interesting that you say that a "thousand faces" will help him follow his grandfather's advice, and I never thought of it that way. I think his invisibility prevents him from gaining anything, rather than enabling him in general, though.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Educational Naturalism

Throughout Native Son, Bigger makes choices. Many of these choices cause him to tumble down a continuous spiral to his eventual trial and execution for the murder and supposed rape of Mary Dalton. While reading this book, I thought at many times to try to call out to Bigger, and give him a bit of guidance because I could see where some of his actions were leading. I realized that I was using education that I had received in my schooling years that Bigger was not fortunate enough to have, and that Bigger's environment hadn't prepared his foresight enough to prevent him from making several fatal mistakes in a row. So is the true culprit Naturalism? I believe that Wright was trying to achieve the same response I gave to seeing Bigger make those mistakes. I believe that his Naturalist "lab" (for lack of a better term) was designed to show how much education can play into the choices we make. And I do not mean only the education you receive in schools. If Bigger had seen
7 comments
Read more

Speeches

In Invisible Man , the narrator seems to have a natural talent for public speaking. He begins speaking during his school years before the Battle Royale and has had a speech during the home eviction. He has also been drafted into the "Brotherhood" to do more public speaking. He seems to have a talent for rousing crowds, even if that was not shown in his Battle Royale speech. After the home eviction speech, he thinks of himself as a famous speaker akin to Booker T. Washington and takes pride in that. Now to the main point. Is the author fond of speeches because it makes him more individual? During his speeches he is separate from the crowd, able to show his views on matters and not be just a cog in a machine (as Norton calls it). Even if he may not be truly visible, his unique existence cannot be fully denied. Is not being able to make speeches why he has retreated within his "hole" during the prologue? Is writing this book and sharing his views and experiences how
4 comments
Read more

Dialects in Literature

In the most recent novel we are reading in class, Their Eyes Were Watching God , the characters all speak in a distinct dialect of English that is non-standard. "I" is changed to "Ah", verbs are shortened, there are double negatives, and so on. Though for some this may be hard to read and understand, especially in a book where most of the story is delivered through dialogue, but I feel that these kinds of literary quirks can really differentiate a story. Not just in a narrative about African Americans, but in other literature with other English dialects. People can usually tell the difference between British English and American Standard English when spoken, but when written as dialogue they very rarely show any of the differences in the dialects. Given, those two are very similar but the same kind of logic can be applied to other dialects of English. Authors usually wrote their dialogue in standard, and they would use a different dialect if the character was "
3 comments
Read more